Clio V6
Clio V6
No, not another one of my famous threads about buying one but my mate just has today.
Went for a spin. I was really impressed actually.
Not as quick as the Elise but the power was very linear.
Noise was fantastic. imo nicer sounding than mine
Went for a spin. I was really impressed actually.
Not as quick as the Elise but the power was very linear.
Noise was fantastic. imo nicer sounding than mine
- craigs135s
- Posts: 1960
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
they get slated by the driving gods on seloc but I've got to say they've always left me feeling a little bit aroused
IMHO renault do make v'good roler skates & the V6 is the most awesome stupid derivative...
I likeee....
one day when I'm to old to get my fat ass in the elise....maybe.

IMHO renault do make v'good roler skates & the V6 is the most awesome stupid derivative...
I likeee....
one day when I'm to old to get my fat ass in the elise....maybe.
Baggy
Silver S1 111s
The Deen
Silver S1 111s
The Deen
I had a 172 for a few years. At the time I was Renaultsport mad, and read just about every article on the things. For my money, I would stick to the 172/182 - especially the trophy model. They say the 172s were just as quick round a track as the s1 V6, but do have a little more practicallity. Lets face it, if you are going to get a 2 seater, you dont want something that looks like a clio. The 172 had the added bonus that you can scare more of your friends at a timeAndy G wrote:spent time chasing one round EF and he couldn't get away from the 182's but nice to see on track!
When his first KH outing?

Having said all that, the V6 does look & sound great!
Yup - was a PTW issue. Not particulaly light (ITRO 1300kg, I think) and not a huge power output for such a big engine.Dominic wrote:I had a 172 for a few years. At the time I was Renaultsport mad, and read just about every article on the things. For my money, I would stick to the 172/182 - especially the trophy model. They say the 172s were just as quick round a track as the s1 V6, but do have a little more practicallity. Lets face it, if you are going to get a 2 seater, you dont want something that looks like a clio. The 172 had the added bonus that you can scare more of your friends at a timeAndy G wrote:spent time chasing one round EF and he couldn't get away from the 182's but nice to see on track!
When his first KH outing?![]()
Having said all that, the V6 does look & sound great!
Shame, as it looked suitably bonkers and (the Mk1) had the R5 Turbo 2 suicide handling traits to make it a true legend if they'd gone the whole hog...

2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R
At EF the V6 couldn't get away from the 182's.Dominic wrote:. For my money, I would stick to the 172/182 - especially the trophy model. They say the 172s were just as quick round a track as the s1 V6, but do have a little more practicallity. Lets face it, if you are going to get a 2 seater, you dont want something that looks like a clio. The 172 had the added bonus that you can scare more of your friends at a time![]()
Having said all that, the V6 does look & sound great!