What should Tom buy?

mac · Post by **mac** » Wed May 17, 2006 4:14 pm

Shug wrote:Dude, one of your tits weighs more than 140kg.....

That's no way to talk about DDtB - and I like to call him a Macspowerette

Mac

Post by **Shug** » Wed May 17, 2006 4:15 pm

mac wrote:
Shug wrote:Dude, one of your tits weighs more than 140kg.....
That's no way to talk about DDtB - and I like to call him a Macspowerette

Mac

There's just a whole load of nasty mental images going on there

MacK · Post by **MacK** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:02 pm

mckeann wrote:
mac wrote:Tom - There is F-all wrong with the output of a standard S2, it's marginally heavier than the S1 (what are we talking 100kg max - and I don't think it is anywhere near that)

S2 - 820kg (for instance) @ 118bhp = 143.90 bhp/tonne

S1 - 720kg @ 118bhp = 163.88 bhp/tonne.

So 20 brake horsepower per tonne.

Factor in driver considerations, Shug driving a Std S2 against me driving a std S1

Shug = 820+80kg = 900kg @ 118 = 131.1111 bhp/tonne

Me = 720kg + 140 kg = 860kg @ 118 = 137.2 bhp/tonne.

That works out at 6bhp/tonne difference.

The S2 isn't a heavy car - and power isn't everything. All you need to do is compare the K powered cars against the Toyota powered ones at Brunty's last week.

Mac

your having a laugh right???? those calculations are dubious at best. A standard S2 is more like 50 kg heavier than a standard S1,

My S2 sport tourer weighed 789 Kg's (with full fuel etc) at 'Stu's weigh in'
last year.

mckeann · Post by **mckeann** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:16 pm

140 kg is approx 21 or 22 stone mate. you aint THAT fat. and difference between basic S1 and S2 is close to 50kg. i think there are loads more options available on the S2 which folk buy, which is why they get the image of being lardy.

MacK · Post by **MacK** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:19 pm

Has the S2 got a bigger fuel tank? Or does it have a bigger radiator etc?

These would both obviously add weight?

Post by **Shug** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:22 pm

MacK wrote:Has the S2 got a bigger fuel tank? Or does it have a bigger radiator etc?

These would both obviously add weight?

No and no AFAIK.

mckeann · Post by **mckeann** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:22 pm

smaller fuel tank actually, same radiator

MacK · Post by **MacK** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:25 pm

Okay, was just trying some obvious answers to the question nobody seems to know the correct answer for

Or do they?

The_Rossatron · Post by **The_Rossatron** » Wed May 17, 2006 5:59 pm

[quote="MacK]

My S2 sport tourer weighed 789 Kg's (with full fuel etc) at 'Stu's weigh in'
last year.

[/quote]

Did anyone on the same weigh in get a figure for an S1?

DDtB · Post by **DDtB** » Wed May 17, 2006 6:27 pm

mac wrote:
Shug wrote:Dude, one of your tits weighs more than 140kg.....
That's no way to talk about DDtB - and I like to call him a Macspowerette

Mac

I'm just a hunka hunka burnin love....... yeahhhhhhh!!!!

DDtB · Post by **DDtB** » Wed May 17, 2006 6:29 pm

I think Tom should go for a standard S1........

.........coz there's nothing better than the smug feeling you get whilst overtaking Ed in a car with nearly half the horses....

Post by **simon** » Wed May 17, 2006 6:38 pm

Tut's car weighs about 760-770ish kg (with Honda) IIRC and Craig's (guy that lives near Tut) cam in around 20kg lighter. Mine was exactly 800kg with a just-under-full tank and mine is the lardy K engined S2.

DDtB · Post by **DDtB** » Wed May 17, 2006 6:39 pm

simon wrote:Tut's car weighs about 760-770ish kg (with Honda) IIRC and Craig's (guy that lives near Tut) cam in around 20kg lighter. Mine was exactly 800kg with a just-under-full tank and mine is the lardy K engined gayboy S2.

I'm a big woofter too.

DDtB · Post by **DDtB** » Wed May 17, 2006 7:09 pm

ha ha ha mr moderator.....

DDtB · Post by **DDtB** » Wed May 17, 2006 7:11 pm