A new low.....

Anything goes in here.....
User avatar
scottishselise
Posts: 1340
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:34 am

Re: A new low.....

Post by scottishselise » Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:32 pm

and take the points, accept it and enjoy your Christmas. Life is too short.

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Re: A new low.....

Post by tut » Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:49 pm

Leaving every thing else aside, if one of us had been driving a car and been stopped for having a dirty windscreen in those conditions, and this weather, I would have been ashamed of them if they just rolled over and accepted it.

As I said earlier, most of the time you put your hands up and accept it, in this instance no way, and that is the opinion of four police friends, appeal against the ticket, give your reasons, and the PF would almost certainly throw it out as a waste of his time.

Why the hell sit back and accept three points without a fight when you think they were awarded wrongly, especially as another three loses you your licence? Campbell was recently accused for having no spine, I hope that was jocular, as I am pretty sure that he for one would not have rolled over in this case.

tut

User avatar
j2 lot
Posts: 7660
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:47 pm
Location: Strathaven / Glasgow

Re: A new low.....

Post by j2 lot » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:21 pm

:withstupid
2015 Lotus Evora
2022 Polestar 2 LRSM Plus
2023 Skoda Kodiaq Sportline

User avatar
scottishselise
Posts: 1340
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:34 am

Re: A new low.....

Post by scottishselise » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:24 pm

Tut, I wish your friend best of luck with the legal battle.

Who accused Campbell of being spineless?

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: A new low.....

Post by Shug » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:13 am

scottishselise wrote:
Who accused Campbell of being spineless?
Eh? - tut, you realise you're talking about a bit of banter when Campbell was talking nonsense, right? Nobody was accusing anybody of anything FFS...
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Re: A new low.....

Post by tut » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:45 am

Apologies if I read it wrongly, it looked as if it was intentional in the context of the posts.

tut

User avatar
Scotty C
Meat
Posts: 8352
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Aberdeen

Re: A new low.....

Post by Scotty C » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:40 am

I really dont think that the cops would have turned round and came after you if it wasnt that bad and IF you didn't see them maybe if your windscreen was clean it would have helped :mrgreen:
"Here for a good time not a long time"

User avatar
scottishselise
Posts: 1340
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:34 am

Re: A new low.....

Post by scottishselise » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:48 am

Nothing like a wee stir up! :mrgreen:

User avatar
ClarkyBoy
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:01 am
Location: Inverurie, Aberdeenshire

Re: A new low.....

Post by ClarkyBoy » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:56 am

Scotty C wrote:I really dont think that the cops would have turned round and came after you if it wasnt that bad and IF you didn't see them maybe if your windscreen was clean it would have helped :mrgreen:
:damnfunny :damnfunny :damnfunny
Image
Vanlife Sprinter
E30 318is / axle stand spec
987.2 Cayman S
[#]=///=[#] ‘88 Panda 4x4
BSA B31
MF35
Stiga Tornado
Many Bicycles

User avatar
rossybee
Posts: 11093
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: A new low.....

Post by rossybee » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:15 pm

GregR wrote:Best advice in that situation is just to take your medicine, eat all the humble pie you can and make sure you're very polite, without being patronising.
scottishselise wrote:and take the points, accept it and enjoy your Christmas. Life is too short.
Image
Ross
---------
1972 Alfaholics Giulia Super
2000 Elise S1 Sport 160
2004 Bentley Conti GT
2017 Schkoda Yeti
2x Hairy GRs (not Toyota)

Now browsing the tech pages :mrgreen:

:cheers

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Re: A new low.....

Post by BiggestNizzy » Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:13 am

3 points is a hard thing for a young driver to take, it's half way to a ban, for us older motorists we can generally take the 3 points and forget about it as a minor inconveniance, so from my perspective taking it and forgetting about it would be the best option.

However if you have have been wronged and you can get legal aid/afford it take it to court, an apprentice at work did it when he got stopped for using his phone (he wasn't). it cost him a few hundred quid the cops who stopped him told 2 different stories in court which annoyed the judge and he got off, and got to keep his licence.

I am not going to say do one thing or the other especially as I wasn't there at the time.
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

User avatar
campbell
Posts: 17338
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:42 pm
Location: West Lothian
Contact:

Re: A new low.....

Post by campbell » Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:05 pm

Shug wrote:
scottishselise wrote:
Who accused Campbell of being spineless?
Eh? - tut, you realise you're talking about a bit of banter when Campbell was talking nonsense, right? Nobody was accusing anybody of anything FFS...
It was banter, but I'd like to put a case for the defence that I wasn't talking nonsense...it was this thread, m'lud.

Anyway, haven't posted for a while so be gentle this is my "first day back" after a week's cold turkey ;-)

I think the lads have been unlucky. They must ask themselves very, very honestly...did anything else happen in advance of being "pulled" that might have attracted attention from the police? If not...then I would be making a complaint. If yes...then I'd try to be grown up about it, take my medicine, and learn.

After all, whether they like it or not, "young lads" will automatically come in for extra scrutiny from the police, any slightest opportunity will be used to "have a word", and as a result you do just have to be squeaky clean (sorry) until you look as old as me then they will stop bothering you ;-)

The other big lesson in here, touched on by Tut actually, is humility and avoiding back-chat. Particularly even when you feel it's to support a friend. Some may call that spineless. I just call it knowing when to keep your mouth shut.

Young drivers are just 2 strikes away from a ban, whereas older (sadly though, not necessarily more experienced) drivers are generally 4. This should incentivise the "youngsters" to be doubly careful while they rack up their flying hours, and then everyone's a winner.

Merry Christmas everybody.

Campbell
http://www.rathmhor.com | Coaching, training, consultancy

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Re: A new low.....

Post by robin » Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:36 pm

No way.

The belief that it's OK for young drivers to be had up on trumped up charges, even if maybe there was some background to it that hasn't been reported, is wrong. The discretion of a traffic officer is pointless if used to discriminate against social groups they disapprove of.

What's worse is that there is no proper standard of evidence required for such a charge. I know of other circumstances where a young driver was done for having tinted windows. OK, that was bollocks too, but the police had a meter that was used to measure the opacity of the window, and it failed, so he was done. Stupid charge, but at least a proper standard of evidence required - fair cop, but all respect lost.

If this had happened to me, I would without doubt be contesting the charge and I would be willing to go all the way to court to have the officers justify their actions, even if I ultimately lost because it's their word against mine that I could see through the screen.

Of course if you commit an offence and get caught, fine, you should take it on the chin and don't be a smart arse.

Cheers,
Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
campbell
Posts: 17338
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:42 pm
Location: West Lothian
Contact:

Re: A new low.....

Post by campbell » Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:41 pm

Erm. "No way"? To what? I think we are agreeing here, are we not!

Have just re-read my own post and can't fathom this one, sorry :-(
http://www.rathmhor.com | Coaching, training, consultancy

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Re: A new low.....

Post by robin » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:18 pm

They must ask themselves very, very honestly...did anything else happen in advance of being "pulled" that might have attracted attention from the police? If not...then I would be making a complaint. If yes...then I'd try to be grown up about it, take my medicine, and learn.
The implication being that if they did something questionable earlier, somehow they should be content with being charged with this nonsense instead.
After all, whether they like it or not, "young lads" will automatically come in for extra scrutiny from the police, any slightest opportunity will be used to "have a word", and as a result you do just have to be squeaky clean (sorry) until you look as old as me then they will stop bothering you ;-)
Why? This is just a broken concept. Traffic officers should pull over drivers that are behaving badly on the roads, young, old or otherwise, have a word and, when appropriate, charge them.

Just my opinion :-)

Cheers,
Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

Post Reply