Anything goes in here.....
-
vx220
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:56 pm
- Location: Turriff
-
Contact:
Post
by vx220 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:15 pm
Right am with you now, didnt know bhp is torque x revs, you learn something new everyday
But thinking about it, what is the equation to work bhp out, as say engine X has 100lb/ft torque, 150bhp but revs to 8000revs, how does the equation work?
-
Shug
- Posts: 13835
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
- Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire
Post
by Shug » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:30 pm
Horsepower is simply a calculation - torque is measured and Horsepower calculated from that. So it's easy to see when Dyno guys are trying to BS you, as the torque curve and horsepower curve will always cross at 5252 RPM
HP = rpm x T(torque)
---------------------------
5252(constant)
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R
-
BiggestNizzy
- Posts: 8932
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: Kilmarnock
-
Contact:
Post
by BiggestNizzy » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:36 pm
The bhp figure will be at a specific RPM
i.e 150hmp @7500 rpm
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A
-
Rich H
- Posts: 9314
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
- Location: Preston
Post
by Rich H » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:24 pm
It also explains why bike engined cars have to be very light, you don't have the grunt to get you off the line.
HP means nothing in isolation - traction engine has maybe 8 hp at 300 rpm but a rediculous amount of torque
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers
-
max1966
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:24 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Post
by max1966 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:43 pm
By way of comparison I have had a chance to look at the engine spec for the current 111R.
Alfa Multiair 1.4 120BHP- 206Nm ~ 152lb-ft @ 1750 rpm
Alfa Multiair 1.4 155BHP- 230Nm ~ 170lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
Lotus 111R 1.8 189BHP- 181Nm ~ 133lb-ft @ 6800 rpm
Lotus SC 1.8 217BHP- 212Nm ~ 156lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
I'm sure someone more knowledgeable can explain which works best.
if evolution don't take care of it, redesign it
-
Rich H
- Posts: 9314
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
- Location: Preston
Post
by Rich H » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:59 pm
Is the multi air a diesel?
If so the trouble is always rev-limits. It will accel quicker but need more gear changes.
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers
-
BiggestNizzy
- Posts: 8932
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: Kilmarnock
-
Contact:
Post
by BiggestNizzy » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:05 pm
Petrol
It has variable timing and is turbocharged
edit you get both
Last edited by
BiggestNizzy on Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A
-
Corranga
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:43 pm
- Location: Fundee, Sundee, SCUMDEE!
Post
by Corranga » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:10 pm
Is the Alfa Multiair the engine in the Mito then?
Is it the same as the Abarth 500 or am I way off the mark?
'16 MINI Cooper S - Family fun hatch
'98 Lotus Elise - Fun day car
'04 Maserati Coupe GT - Manual, v8, Italian...
'18 Mazda Mx5 - The wife's, so naturally my daily
'19 Ducati Monster 797 - Baby bike bike
-
Dominic
- Posts: 14441
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:14 am
- Location: Milton Of Campsie
-
Contact:
Post
by Dominic » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:44 pm
-
max1966
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:24 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Post
by max1966 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:30 pm
Yes it is in the Mito and one of the Punto's and soon the new Giuletta.
Tech info infers a free revving engine and I think I remember a lower rev threshold being mentioned, it does however explain how a more modern perceptibly low powered engine can be made to work.
Ignore the figures above as they appear to be for the current 1.4 TB engine, can't find details of the newer engine but as it is supposed to improve on these numbers would bode well for Multiair.
Given the figures and presumably the lighter weight of a smaller capacity unit, I'm sure a 135bhp S3 unit with low down grunt would tick plenty boxes.
Dull but 'true'

Last edited by
max1966 on Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
if evolution don't take care of it, redesign it
-
Gareth
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:19 pm
- Location: The Moon
Post
by Gareth » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:38 pm
Nothing wrong with 130-140bhp in an Elise....I've been having a hoot in mine this week but then it is one of the early S1s so nice and light

No airbags, ABS or insulation to weigh it down.
-
Edin430
- Posts: 2952
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:11 pm
- Location: Edinburgh..
Post
by Edin430 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:51 pm
Sorry , I should have thought more clearly when I worded that.. I should have said a high mileage old example for 6k.
I have seen a number of Elise S1's go for between 6k and 7k over the last year or two on PH and Ebay. S1's are sitting between £8k and £10k for a normal example these days. I think we are years away before S2 prices get as low as £6k, but I could be wrong. Both S1's and S2's seem to be going up in price if anything!
Didn't mean to twist the knickers of the S1 owners

-
DDtB
- Dodgy Dave the Ba***rd
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:18 pm
Post
by DDtB » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:04 pm
X7LDA wrote:Sorry , I should have thought more clearly when I worded that.. I should have said a high mileage old example for 6k.
I have seen a number of Elise S1's go for between 6k and 7k over the last year or two on PH and Ebay. S1's are sitting between £8k and £10k for a normal example these days. I think we are years away before S2 prices get as low as £6k, but I could be wrong. Both S1's and S2's seem to be going up in price if anything!
Didn't mean to twist the knickers of the S1 owners

You're forgiven! Now don't let it happen again!!

-
smee
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: Inverurie
-
Contact:
Post
by smee » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:43 pm
I've given the carbon thing some more thought. Currently if you punt your elise into the tyre barrier and crack the clam it's not cheap, however how much more would a carbon fibre clam set you back and are they as repariable?
S1 Elise - LRG MMC
Exige 390 LRG
GR Yaris
Leighton T6.1
-
BiggestNizzy
- Posts: 8932
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: Kilmarnock
-
Contact:
Post
by BiggestNizzy » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:26 am
How much lighter is carbon fibre than glass fibre ? the body is non structural so doesn't have to be strong, they know glass fibre and I will bet you a pound to a penny that it will be glass fibre.
although they could make it from boron whiskers*
It will be more of the same, probably using VVA rather than a modified elise tub, following along from the evora styling whise but probably more stubby, price £22k for the base model but you will be able to spec up the trim etc etc.
I like the idea of small engines, although they will have to have similar performance figures to tempt current elise owners
*stronger and so expensive the F1 guys stay away
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A