Scottish Elises

rossybee · Post by **rossybee** » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:40 pm

So, I took my COFP and both parts of my licence, and my chequebook to the counter, and was dealt with by a rather stern lady, who kindly scribbled some stuff on my counterpart about being a very naughty boy.

Are they trained to be so disapproving?

Noops · Post by **Noops** » Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:28 pm

Sorry for finding all this rather funny .

I'm allowed

Post by **campbell** » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:48 pm

easty-5 wrote:Caught on Friday (13th!!) just north of Dunblane on the A90 at 80mph.

I take it you meant A9

And rough luck with 80 in a 70...with 10% +2 that implies you were just 1mph over. Albeit might have been an indicated 85, for which you clearly should be shot

[/Paxman mode]

In Englandshire they surely must set things for 80 absolutely min, judging by the pace of traffic passing us en route home from hols last weekend

robin · Post by **robin** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:06 am

Yes, judging by yesterday's trip up the M6/M74 at 80 tuts you're roughly midstream when the motorway is flowing normally - plenty of people passing by - some at eyewatering speeds - but still some non-commercial traffic at <80.

Cheers,
Robin

tut · Post by **tut** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:06 pm

Before the scam vans you could safely slot in behind a fast car, keep a good distant behind, and he would be hit by the patrol car radar gun.

Just not worth it with the robots, if you see them they have already got you. This is the reason why I have not had a point in five years after collecting 11 points in a single year.

tut

Mikie711 · Post by **Mikie711** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:31 am

Anybody know a descent solicitor for a speeding case in Aberdeen.

tut · Post by **tut** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:19 am

Ask Colin about his, you may even get discounted rates together?

Ali C also used one. Main thing is to get it reduced from dangerous driving, to careless.

tut

scottishselise · Post by **scottishselise** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:42 pm

Good luck, I had a case recently and just got a solicitor to ask for it to be postponed.

Mikie711 · Post by **Mikie711** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:22 pm

tut, it is for speeding not careless/dangerous driving. It's only because I am away that I need one, won't be home before the court date.

Peter · Post by **Peter** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:32 pm

Mikie711 wrote:tut, it is for speeding not careless/dangerous driving. It's only because I am away that I need one, won't be home before the court date.

Just tell them and they should postpone

tut · Post by **tut** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:12 pm

I must have got that wrong then Mike, I thought Ali told me that he was automatically charged with dangerous driving as it was over 100, and he had to get it reduced to careless.

This may be useful for the likely outcome.

http://www.drivingban.co.uk/drivingban/ ... =Calculate

tut

alicrozier · Post by **alicrozier** » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:16 pm

tut wrote:I must have got that wrong then Mike, I thought Ali told me that he was automatically charged with dangerous driving as it was over 100, and he had to get it reduced to careless.

This may be useful for the likely outcome.

http://www.drivingban.co.uk/drivingban/ ... =Calculate

tut

That was indeed the case tut but dropped on the day, barstewards. Speeding only.

Scottish Elises

NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP

Re: NiP