pete wrote:PhilA wrote:but I also agree about we are now backed into a corner if we stay in the uk.
I said that to folk when the independence pony was being brought to market, but everyone I said it to laughed at me.
its just like when you push your luck too much when you are a kid - and all the "let you off" that your parents have given you are suddenly removed.
devo-max was the way to go, stupid clueless SNP wanting independence "at all costs".
Its all they care about... i dont trust that.
You know they were elected don't you?
they were elected, omg wow
Answer: does it need answering?
pete wrote:And you know that we are in a union with England, they are not our parents?
nooo... not... our... parents? feck, why didnt someone say that before.
Answer: does it need answering?
pete wrote:Salmond has a much clearer mandate than Cameron, but equally Cameron is supposed to be responding to the wishes of the electorate.
"mandate" is not clear to either. Tory didnt win it fully. People voting for SNP did so for the policies to run the Scottish P, not all of them want independence. So that "mandate" (hate that word) is not tested at best.
Comment: mandate To Do What exactly?
pete wrote:Genuine question, do you think Cameron has a democratic mandate in relation to Scottish independence, and if so what is it?
Who cares? Really?
Answer: mandate To Do What?
To have an opinion on it? Yes.
As much as many people in Scotland HATE the Tory, some of us actually VOTE for Tory. If I put aside my political responses I would say that I am fed up of non-Tory Scottish voters saying FOR ME that noone in Scotland voted for them.
If the mandate is to have a say, opinion and try and persuade others of this opinion then in my opinion he most definately does.
As does every other MP/MSP/human being.