Are you with Direct Line? Then cancel immediately!
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:48 pm
SPEED LIMIT CALL IS 'MISLEADING': CAMPAIGN
Insurer calls for 40mph on rural roads
Calls for 40mph
Calls for 40mph
In calling for a blanket 40mph speed limit on rural roads, insurer Direct Line is misleading the public, according to road safety campaign Safe Speed.
Safe Speed refuted the insurer's claim that a 'high number of fatalities now occurring on country lanes', and said: "contrary to the sensationalist headline claim, very few drivers 'use the road like a racetrack'."
Safe Speed issued the following statement:
The first critical mistake is to use figures that apply to all rural roads ranging from high specification dual carriageways to low specification country lanes. Clearly different issues apply to such widely different road types. High mileages are being driven safely on all road types by the majority of drivers. Calling for a 40mph speed limit on rural roads without qualification, is not a valid road safety suggestion - it's a PR stunt.
National road safety trends are extremely disappointing, but rural roads are not especially bad.
The absurd claim that 'one third of crashes are caused by speeding' was debunked years ago. The truth is that around five per cent of crashes have 'exceeding the speed limit' as a contributory factor, and often 'exceeding the speed limit' plays no part in crash causation.
Most speeding is the result of drivers recognising a suitable and safe speed from the immediate conditions. In order to drive safely we all carry out ongoing subconscious risk assessments. When hazards threaten we slow down. When they do not we speed up.
Far from being a problem, this behaviour is absolutely vital to road safety. We must have drivers who adjust their speed to suit the hazard environment. Since the risk assessment process is subconscious, it isn't surprising that drivers are largely unable to properly explain their behaviour.
Campaign founder Paul Smith said: "A 40mph blanket rural speed limit is neither necessary nor desirable. Unnecessarily slow speed limits reduce respect for worthwhile speed limits, deskill driving and can cause dangerous frustration and inattention.
"We have had 'speed kills' road safety policy for over a decade with widespread speed limit reductions and mushrooming speed cameras. Despite the self-congratulatory claims from Department for Transport and the camera partnerships, these policies are an abject failure with road deaths and road crash hospitalisations stubbornly failing to fall. The system is only supported by tortured statistics and oversimplified arguments. The 'slower is safer brigade' have yet to explain why it isn't working after over a decade.
"The authorities must stop denying reality. 'Speed kills' road safety policy has failed comprehensively. We must return to psychologically sound road safety policies based on skills, attitudes and responsibilities. We'll see no improvement in road safety until we do.
"You can't measure safe driving in miles per hour."
Insurer calls for 40mph on rural roads
Calls for 40mph
Calls for 40mph
In calling for a blanket 40mph speed limit on rural roads, insurer Direct Line is misleading the public, according to road safety campaign Safe Speed.
Safe Speed refuted the insurer's claim that a 'high number of fatalities now occurring on country lanes', and said: "contrary to the sensationalist headline claim, very few drivers 'use the road like a racetrack'."
Safe Speed issued the following statement:
The first critical mistake is to use figures that apply to all rural roads ranging from high specification dual carriageways to low specification country lanes. Clearly different issues apply to such widely different road types. High mileages are being driven safely on all road types by the majority of drivers. Calling for a 40mph speed limit on rural roads without qualification, is not a valid road safety suggestion - it's a PR stunt.
National road safety trends are extremely disappointing, but rural roads are not especially bad.
The absurd claim that 'one third of crashes are caused by speeding' was debunked years ago. The truth is that around five per cent of crashes have 'exceeding the speed limit' as a contributory factor, and often 'exceeding the speed limit' plays no part in crash causation.
Most speeding is the result of drivers recognising a suitable and safe speed from the immediate conditions. In order to drive safely we all carry out ongoing subconscious risk assessments. When hazards threaten we slow down. When they do not we speed up.
Far from being a problem, this behaviour is absolutely vital to road safety. We must have drivers who adjust their speed to suit the hazard environment. Since the risk assessment process is subconscious, it isn't surprising that drivers are largely unable to properly explain their behaviour.
Campaign founder Paul Smith said: "A 40mph blanket rural speed limit is neither necessary nor desirable. Unnecessarily slow speed limits reduce respect for worthwhile speed limits, deskill driving and can cause dangerous frustration and inattention.
"We have had 'speed kills' road safety policy for over a decade with widespread speed limit reductions and mushrooming speed cameras. Despite the self-congratulatory claims from Department for Transport and the camera partnerships, these policies are an abject failure with road deaths and road crash hospitalisations stubbornly failing to fall. The system is only supported by tortured statistics and oversimplified arguments. The 'slower is safer brigade' have yet to explain why it isn't working after over a decade.
"The authorities must stop denying reality. 'Speed kills' road safety policy has failed comprehensively. We must return to psychologically sound road safety policies based on skills, attitudes and responsibilities. We'll see no improvement in road safety until we do.
"You can't measure safe driving in miles per hour."