Be careful what you post!

Post by ed » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:45 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edi ... 502167.stm

Yet another twonk who probably deserved to get caught!

thinfourth · Post by **thinfourth** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:51 pm

Maybe i should delete this then

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBx-4l6E_xg

ExigeKen · Post by **ExigeKen** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:53 pm

Is that the equivalent of turning yourself in

Post by ed » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:54 pm

I couldn't start to count the number of laws you were breaking!

Post by **simon** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:33 pm

I thought digital videos/photos were not admissable as evidence in court (except speed cameras) so surely he can take it to court and there'll be no evidence? One for Mr Freeman, had they not already screwed him for something.

Post by **campbell** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:05 pm

Quote from the article:

"Police are investigating another complaint about a car being driven at more than 100mph in East Lothian, footage of which was also posted on the YouTube website."

NeilP, you been out on manoeuvres again...

GregR · Post by **GregR** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:39 pm

simon wrote:I thought digital videos/photos were not admissable as evidence in court (except speed cameras

Sadly misinformed.

Post by **simon** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:47 pm

GregR wrote:Sadly misinformed.

So what's the deal with it then?
Certainly used to be the case because RAC/AA used to tell you to leave a disposable camera in your car in case of accidents as digital pics weren't allowed as evidence.

j2 lot · Post by **j2 lot** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:12 pm

GregR is right, if you think about it most CCTV is now digital - stills and videos all useable evidence.