Geo with Mark from Banchory
Geo with Mark from Banchory
Thought I would cross post one of Tuts emails from Yahoo. Another satisfied customer. Sounds excellent. Need to decide If I'm going to get it done before East Fortune.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spent yesterday at Marks, he worked on the car for six hours. A pleasure to
watch him in action and work with him. The equipment that he has
fabricated, and his means of setting it up to measure toe, is something
else, but he is a stickler for accuracy, and it is more satisfying and
re-assuring to see it done this way and check the measurements than it is by
laser. Of course I forgot to take photos, but maybe someone else could when
they go along.
Started with corner weighting, and I doubt if he will see a car further out,
The front was 150kgs left and 201 right, a difference of 51kgs. The rear
was better at 20kgs difference. He adjusted this out to 8kgs front and 9kgs
rear. This resulted in a ride height if 110/112 front empty, which evened
out with driver in, and 116/116 rear.
Total weight with empty boot and half tank of fuel was 764kgs, so compared
to Craig’s identical car, the Honda conversion would seem to add about
22kgs.
Front and rear camber was fairly conservative with 0.3deg difference side to
side, so we adjusted to -1.3degF and -2.4degR.
Toe was not too far out front, and was set at 0.3mm out overall.
Rear toe was way out, 2.0mm toe in on the left, but 1.0mm toe out on the
right, a difference of 3mm. This was adjusted to 2.0mm toe in on each side.
He has caster scales, so he measured it at 3.7degs, which is in the middle
of the Lotus spec of 3.6 to 4.0.
We then went out for a run, and the difference in the handling and overall
feel once upto speed was very apparent. Straight line stability was better,
turn in was nicer, and the back end twitchiness and feeling of early
breakaway was improved. However I definitely need to fit a new steering
rack, this one is rather tired.
So at least I now know that any failings on the track are down to the driver
or the tyres, and at least with the tyres I can do something about it. The
driver is probably beyond redemption.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spent yesterday at Marks, he worked on the car for six hours. A pleasure to
watch him in action and work with him. The equipment that he has
fabricated, and his means of setting it up to measure toe, is something
else, but he is a stickler for accuracy, and it is more satisfying and
re-assuring to see it done this way and check the measurements than it is by
laser. Of course I forgot to take photos, but maybe someone else could when
they go along.
Started with corner weighting, and I doubt if he will see a car further out,
The front was 150kgs left and 201 right, a difference of 51kgs. The rear
was better at 20kgs difference. He adjusted this out to 8kgs front and 9kgs
rear. This resulted in a ride height if 110/112 front empty, which evened
out with driver in, and 116/116 rear.
Total weight with empty boot and half tank of fuel was 764kgs, so compared
to Craig’s identical car, the Honda conversion would seem to add about
22kgs.
Front and rear camber was fairly conservative with 0.3deg difference side to
side, so we adjusted to -1.3degF and -2.4degR.
Toe was not too far out front, and was set at 0.3mm out overall.
Rear toe was way out, 2.0mm toe in on the left, but 1.0mm toe out on the
right, a difference of 3mm. This was adjusted to 2.0mm toe in on each side.
He has caster scales, so he measured it at 3.7degs, which is in the middle
of the Lotus spec of 3.6 to 4.0.
We then went out for a run, and the difference in the handling and overall
feel once upto speed was very apparent. Straight line stability was better,
turn in was nicer, and the back end twitchiness and feeling of early
breakaway was improved. However I definitely need to fit a new steering
rack, this one is rather tired.
So at least I now know that any failings on the track are down to the driver
or the tyres, and at least with the tyres I can do something about it. The
driver is probably beyond redemption.
Mark does it for £80 (more if you want him to play around with bump steer)
I can second everything that Tut says - In fact I felt more than a little guilty only handing over 80notes at the end of it.
He does everything to the n th degree, checking and double checking. Not only that he can explain what he's doing and how it affects the car.
The set up is entirely in your hands - he'll go as wild or mild as you wish and explain to you what will happen if you go too wild.
I settled for 1.1 front and 2.2 rear camber, 1mm toe in on each front and I think 2 or 3 mm on the rears.
Corner weighting is also done and adjusted (if you have adjustable platform springs)
Just a young guy working out of his garage, but he know what he's doing.
Mac
I can second everything that Tut says - In fact I felt more than a little guilty only handing over 80notes at the end of it.
He does everything to the n th degree, checking and double checking. Not only that he can explain what he's doing and how it affects the car.
The set up is entirely in your hands - he'll go as wild or mild as you wish and explain to you what will happen if you go too wild.
I settled for 1.1 front and 2.2 rear camber, 1mm toe in on each front and I think 2 or 3 mm on the rears.
Corner weighting is also done and adjusted (if you have adjustable platform springs)
Just a young guy working out of his garage, but he know what he's doing.
Mac
S2 Elise (cobalt blue with stripes) - toy spec
Caterham 7 - hillclimb spec
Yamaha Thundercat - 2 wheeled toy spec
Caterham 7 - hillclimb spec
Yamaha Thundercat - 2 wheeled toy spec
I'm badly in need of a geo.
Does mark do this for a living or is he doing this at mates rates?
Are the 340R dry settings any good? Or somehting a little less agressive for road use?
Any thoughts?
RIch
Does mark do this for a living or is he doing this at mates rates?
Are the 340R dry settings any good? Or somehting a little less agressive for road use?
Any thoughts?
RIch
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers
- alicrozier
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:58 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
Mark does it for a living but the rate is good (general competition car stuff, not just geo). 
I think there are 340R settings for road and track???
Either would be fine I think for what you're after - both less aggressive than Gordons settings.
Cheers,
Ali
I think there are 340R settings for road and track???
Either would be fine I think for what you're after - both less aggressive than Gordons settings.
Cheers,
Ali
All characters appearing in this post are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Any references to laptimes, speed or driving on the public highway are purely for dramatic effect.
Any references to laptimes, speed or driving on the public highway are purely for dramatic effect.
- alicrozier
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:58 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
Done this morning, as everyone says, he knows his stuff and he is more than happy to chat about what he is doing and offer his thoughs. Really thorough and very meticulous.
In the end I settled for
Camber -.9 F -2.1R
Toe out 'a bit' front, in 2mm R
Feels fantastic. Nice and sharp turn in and loads of confidence into corners.
Cheers Mark keep up the good work!
Oh and I left those new shims in the car
if anyone needs any rear shims I have 2 pairs thin and 2 pairs thick.
Rich
In the end I settled for
Camber -.9 F -2.1R
Toe out 'a bit' front, in 2mm R
Feels fantastic. Nice and sharp turn in and loads of confidence into corners.
Cheers Mark keep up the good work!
Oh and I left those new shims in the car
Rich
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers
