Nuts

The place to "speak geek"
Post Reply
Hambo
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 11:56 am

Nuts

Post by Hambo » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:23 pm

Is ther nuts and bolts for the suspension in the Elise parts,
Full stainless steel nut and bolt kit.?

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 9314
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Preston

Re: Nuts

Post by Rich H » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:26 pm

Hambo wrote:Is ther nuts and bolts for the suspension in the Elise parts,
Full stainless steel nut and bolt kit.?
Eh?

Get 8.8 bolts and nylock nuts from your local nuts and bolts supplier. I would rather break a bolt than uprate the bolts and break something more important!!

Stainless may well be too brittle to cope.
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Post by robin » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:52 pm

Yes, you absolutely do not want to use SS on your suspension parts (unless the manufacturer designed it that way, of course, but I doubt you'll find such a thing).

To protect against corrosion, copper slip the shank before fitting, then tighten the nyloc, then copperslip what's left. It will rapidly attract crud, so will look corroded, but actually won't be.

You can get bolts that are treated to prevent corrosion, but commonly not in 8.8 and below.

For the hub-to-plinth bolts there has been a whole load of debate recently and in the end Lotus have suggested using a 10.9 cap head bolt, even on the alloy uprights (though in this case, still torqued to the 8.8 spec torque - this implies that you need to check them frequently).

Cheers,
Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
hendeg
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:18 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Post by hendeg » Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:07 pm

robin wrote:Yes, you absolutely do not want to use SS on your suspension parts (unless the manufacturer designed it that way, of course, but I doubt you'll find such a thing).
There is a range of stainless steel bolts that are available in 8.8 and 10.9 grades (http://www.bufab-stainless.se/eng/index.htm). I can supply so PM me with sizes if you're interested.

You could also consider using Nordlock washers (http://www.nordlock.com) in place of nyloc nuts. How did you get on with them Lawrence?

Gary.
Exige GT

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Post by robin » Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:49 pm

Interesting ....

Are these bolts guaranteed to behave in all ways like the 8.8/10.9 items they replace? For example, will the 8.8 variant bend in the same way a normal steel 8.8 bolt would bend when overloaded, or will they hold on longer without deforming and then break.

For the suspension parts, you really want them to bend first I think ... but then I am no expert!

Cheers,
Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
hendeg
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:18 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Post by hendeg » Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:44 am

robin wrote:Interesting ....

Are these bolts guaranteed to behave in all ways like the 8.8/10.9 items they replace? For example, will the 8.8 variant bend in the same way a normal steel 8.8 bolt would bend when overloaded, or will they hold on longer without deforming and then break.

For the suspension parts, you really want them to bend first I think ... but then I am no expert!

Cheers,
Robin
They are designed to have the same Tensile and Yield strengths as their equivalent carbon steel bolts;

Tensile strength measures the force required to pull something such as rope, wire, or a structural beam to the point where it breaks.

Yield strength is the stress at which material strain changes from elastic deformation to plastic deformation, causing it to deform permanently.

So, they should perform exactly the same. There are variances when you get into high and low temperatures because carbon steel becomes more brittle. Even allowing for Scottish winters, I don't think it would have an impact on car parts :wink: .
Exige GT

User avatar
alicrozier
Posts: 4394
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Post by alicrozier » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:02 pm

hendeg wrote:
robin wrote:Interesting ....

Are these bolts guaranteed to behave in all ways like the 8.8/10.9 items they replace? For example, will the 8.8 variant bend in the same way a normal steel 8.8 bolt would bend when overloaded, or will they hold on longer without deforming and then break.

For the suspension parts, you really want them to bend first I think ... but then I am no expert!

Cheers,
Robin
They are designed to have the same Tensile and Yield strengths as their equivalent carbon steel bolts;

Tensile strength measures the force required to pull something such as rope, wire, or a structural beam to the point where it breaks.

Yield strength is the stress at which material strain changes from elastic deformation to plastic deformation, causing it to deform permanently.

So, they should perform exactly the same. There are variances when you get into high and low temperatures because carbon steel becomes more brittle. Even allowing for Scottish winters, I don't think it would have an impact on car parts :wink: .

At the risk of being pedantic...not strictly true ;)

They can have identical Yield and UTS but different Youngs Modulus. To take an extreme example, if the bolts were Titanium (with the same Yield and UTS) the Youngs Modulus is approximately half that of Steel therefore would deflect twice as far for the same given load. (15 vs 30x10E6 psi)
They could also perform in a radically different manner from the yield point to eventual failure...

This is all theoretical codswallop however as in practical terms the modulus of carbon and stainless steels are as near as makes no difference. :D
All characters appearing in this post are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Any references to laptimes, speed or driving on the public highway are purely for dramatic effect.

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 9314
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Preston

Post by Rich H » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:37 pm

Bet thay cost more than 10p each too...

I'll stick with 8.8 mild steel BZP thanks... :lol:
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers

YvoTuk
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 9:05 am
Location: Holland
Contact:

Post by YvoTuk » Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:11 pm

Can't speak for the kit EP is doing, but our kit sure doens't include any stainless replacements for suspension parts.

The kit we're doing is taken from my (old) personal website http://www.lotus-elise.nl where I listed all the nuts and bolts / washers etc. which I found on my car.

It's not a 'general purpose jobby' it's specifically for the S1 or S2 and from personal experience, I can say that it's really worth doing this.

As for the suspension bolts, I do refresh these from time to time. I'm actually looking into offering a kit of correct spec bolts for suspension parts.
Image

Post Reply