And you gave ME a red card??? Thats got to be a 2 match banjasonliddell wrote: Tesco's Sweetened Soya in the yellow'n'blue cartons - very good replica milk

[
Finally.... someone who eats the bix the same as me. Maybe now the villagers will revoke my banished status.alicrozier wrote:My 6 Weetabix technique involved stacking 5 on their side with the 6th on its side running perpendicular. Milk could then be poured on until level full - wait for sookage then top up.
Small bowls reguired more sophisticated stacking techniques...
Critical was application of sugar after the milk as otherwise the milk would wash it all off into the bottom of the bowl.
/Must resist double entendre factionBiggestNizzy wrote:it's a fine balance to dry is just as bad as to soggy thats why I use a 2 step milk process,alicrozier wrote:OK I'm a quick eater...![]()
I'd rather be too soggy than too dry though...![]()
5mm of milk
sook
refill to 5mm deep
milk must be poured over the weetabix evenly so you dont get dry ends
Wouldn't be enough - I was thinking more a knuckle rap of McLaren type magnitudesteve_weegie wrote:And you gave ME a red card??? Thats got to be a 2 match banjasonliddell wrote: Tesco's Sweetened Soya in the yellow'n'blue cartons - very good replica milk
$$$$$rossybee wrote:Wouldn't be enough - I was thinking more a knuckle rap of McLaren type magnitudesteve_weegie wrote:And you gave ME a red card??? Thats got to be a 2 match banjasonliddell wrote: Tesco's Sweetened Soya in the yellow'n'blue cartons - very good replica milk![]()
![]()
One more vote (who would have thought there were three of us) although your delicate application of milk can be avoided by bolting your food.Matelotman wrote:Finally.... someone who eats the bix the same as me. Maybe now the villagers will revoke my banished status.alicrozier wrote:My 6 Weetabix technique involved stacking 5 on their side with the 6th on its side running perpendicular. Milk could then be poured on until level full - wait for sookage then top up.
Small bowls reguired more sophisticated stacking techniques...
Critical was application of sugar after the milk as otherwise the milk would wash it all off into the bottom of the bowl.
(4 is my max though)
pete wrote:One more vote (who would have thought there were three of us) although your delicate application of milk can be avoided by bolting your food.Matelotman wrote:Finally.... someone who eats the bix the same as me. Maybe now the villagers will revoke my banished status.alicrozier wrote:My 6 Weetabix technique involved stacking 5 on their side with the 6th on its side running perpendicular. Milk could then be poured on until level full - wait for sookage then top up.
Small bowls reguired more sophisticated stacking techniques...
Critical was application of sugar after the milk as otherwise the milk would wash it all off into the bottom of the bowl.
(4 is my max though)
2 weetabix in bowl, a liberal splash of milk to 3/4 of the way up the biscuits (which are laid flat) followed by a liberal spoonful of sugar on each biscuit. The weetabixes will remain at the right consistency if eaten quickly. Keep adding Weetabix and sugar (that should be enough milk to do 3 with only a quick splash to wet the top required) until full, 4 is a good number, so is 6 if hungry, more is not unknown.
pete
(Weetabixasaurus)
The above may be complimented with a full English (OK Scottish) if hungover (keep Weetabix numbers in line with equation below). But as that takes so long to prepare I have the Weetabix first. Serious hangovers (Grade 4 and above) should be treated with tea and Marlboro Lights (Marlboro in emergencies) except I don't smoke anymore so just tea. Coffee is for Southerners and Americans and I will have no truck with it.
The following only partially explores the complex relationship between early morning cereal consumption and mid morning or early afternoon fried food consumption.
Let x=number of Weetabix to be consumed
Let y=number of hours until cooked breakfast is expected.
Let z=number of hours until cooked breakfast arrives
Let p=number of people expecting to be fed
Let n=number of people involved in preparing breakfast
Let t=time to collect ingredients
Actually this is way too complicated to be represented by just one equation - I'll have to work on the graph that demonstrates the complex relationship between n, y and z (these would need to be represented graphically as there is an optimum value for n depending on k (kitchen size) and z! Indeed a long t, a small n and a large p can actually result in a reduction in z (for a constant y obviously!!!).
A reduction in y can have a counter intuitive impact on z as more haste does not always provide more speed.
Generally an increase in k will reduce z as it permits a more efficent use of a large n but too large a k can be impractical, especially for a small p. So we also need a graph to explore the relationship between p and k, incorporating an important subset of k, kP which describes the proximity of the various appliances and work surfaces in k.
Look it's about 1 for every half an hour I have to wait. Unles I am in someone else's house in which case I limit it to 2 becasue they can get a bit funny when they discover I have eaten all their Weetabix and most of their sugar in a 3 minute feeding frenzy. To say nothing of a pint of milk. Has anyone actually read down this far?