After last night's TG, slightly worrying pic...

rossybee · Post by **rossybee** » Mon May 08, 2006 10:40 am

*cough*

eek!

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Mon May 08, 2006 10:42 am

can't see it.

rossybee · Post by **rossybee** » Mon May 08, 2006 10:47 am

Pic not working directly onto page (or whatever the IT techy jargon is

) so changed it to a link

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Mon May 08, 2006 10:54 am

been wondering about that for years. has anyone ever asked the question in the press?

tenkfeet · Post by **tenkfeet** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:07 am

Somebody tried to get some of his hair to DNA test it.

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:19 am

i imagine thats the kind of thing the press would never dare to print and nobody would risk suggesting. as its not really scandal that affects the country, noone would gain, but it would wreck his life, theres no point. government and security services just decide it never gets out.
i guess maybe it's also similar to the tom cruse rumours.

Lawrence · Post by **Lawrence** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:33 am

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:40 am

no pic

Post by **Shug** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:43 am

Yeah - but you can guess where he's going with this....

TBH, I thought it would have been a fairly open secret - the toffery shagging about, that never happens!!!

And (no distaste meant to any royal lovers on here) be honest - Diana, well, you would have, wouldn't you?

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:46 am

yup, fair point. and i am a royal lover.

(do your worst shug...)

Post by **Shug** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:50 am

Christ, when did I go over 2000 posts!

/thread drift....

rossybee · Post by **rossybee** » Mon May 08, 2006 10:59 pm

Shug wrote:And (no distaste meant to any royal lovers on here) be honest - Diana, well, you would have, wouldn't you?

Too damn rite!

Oh, and thanks Lawrence, my link's donald ducked again