Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Anything goes in here.....
User avatar
C7Steve
Posts: 4523
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:00 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by C7Steve » Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:59 pm

Take a look here;

http://youtu.be/g-W5a44Q99c

Steve.

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by BiggestNizzy » Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:41 am

C7Steve wrote:Take a look here;

http://youtu.be/g-W5a44Q99c

Steve.

It keep interesting company

http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/nordschleife.html
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Shug » Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:43 am

Jings. He's not lacking commitment, is he?

Brave bugger.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
Doc883
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Livingston

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Doc883 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:47 am

They have that down as the year 2000 when in reality it's 2013
87. Lotus Exige S 7:53.00 157 0 350 / 1080 Christian Gebhart

As a Renaultsport fan and given the non-stop hype and praise EVO Magazine, amongst others, lavish on the M135i I think the fact that the R26.R beats it is hugely impressive :D
That's 230hp & front wheel drive (so obviously the wrong wheels :wink: ) v rear wheel drive and 320hp.

178. Renault Megane R26.R 8:16.90 230hp
187. BMW M135i 8:18.00 320hp
S-Max Titanium X Sport - Wife Spec
Audi RS3 Quattro spec all weather beast

User avatar
Mike Scib
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:04 pm

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Mike Scib » Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:14 am

Now lets try the M135i on sticky tyres :wink:
alicrozier wrote:As Robin said, need to be comfortable and confident to push right up to the limit - sometimes you only find the limit by going beyond it...
(that's why I think Mike will do fine, that and his lack of imagination). :roll: :lol:

User avatar
Doc883
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Livingston

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Doc883 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:22 am

Mike Scib wrote:Now lets try the M135i on sticky tyres :wink:
Not the Renault's fault as that's how it left the factory :wink:
Obviously Ring Times are subjective with so many variances (weather, driver, tyre choice) etc but even with stickier tyres I would have thought the BM's greater power would have paid dividends pulling way on all the straights.

Out of interest what tyres was the Exige running ?
S-Max Titanium X Sport - Wife Spec
Audi RS3 Quattro spec all weather beast

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by tut » Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:23 am

The new 911 GT3 punched well above its weight, no 19 and ahead of all the Ferraris and other Porsches bar one, and driven by an unnamed driver.

tut

User avatar
Scotty C
Meat
Posts: 8352
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Scotty C » Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:38 am

I would have thought it would have been faster then that.
"Here for a good time not a long time"

User avatar
Doc883
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Livingston

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Doc883 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:48 am

tut wrote:The new 911 GT3 punched well above its weight, no 19 and ahead of all the Ferraris and other Porsches bar one, and driven by an unnamed driver. tut
The Nissan GT-R never fails to impress & remains the nemesis of the establishment. It's hardly a light weight @ 1736kg but appears to defy all logic with what it's capable off :shock:

10. Nissan GT-R 7:19.10 550hp / 1736kg Toshio Suzuki
S-Max Titanium X Sport - Wife Spec
Audi RS3 Quattro spec all weather beast

User avatar
Andy G
Posts: 11385
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Dirleton/Gullane
Contact:

Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Andy G » Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:57 am

Yeah but the gtr won't do 3 laps on a tank...
AMG GT-R
Atom 4 - CM425
Lotus Esprit S4S
G30 M5 Comp
Ferrari 599
Lotus Elise S1 "Shed" spec

User avatar
Mike Scib
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:04 pm

Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by Mike Scib » Wed Sep 18, 2013 12:59 pm

Scotty C wrote:I would have thought it would have been faster then that.
What would your 2-11 do?

Remember that is a full lap, not bridge to gantry.
alicrozier wrote:As Robin said, need to be comfortable and confident to push right up to the limit - sometimes you only find the limit by going beyond it...
(that's why I think Mike will do fine, that and his lack of imagination). :roll: :lol:

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4314
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by mwmackenzie » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:29 pm

Panamera (Barge) 7.50 :shock:

I'm surprised that the M3 CSL with only 10bhp and over 300kg more was faster than the Exige S ?
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Merc family hack [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

User avatar
ClarkyBoy
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:01 am
Location: Inverurie, Aberdeenshire

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by ClarkyBoy » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:40 pm

mwmackenzie wrote:Panamera (Barge) 7.50 :shock:

I'm surprised that the M3 CSL with only 10bhp and over 300kg more was faster than the Exige S ?
I'd put that down to more CSL's being ragged round the ring more times than the Exige?

shed load of variables on fast laps,

a good gauge is usually sport auto (german car mag) pretty much the same drivers setting each time (usually Horst Von Saurma).

quick time none the less!
Image
Vanlife Sprinter
E30 318is / axle stand spec
987.2 Cayman S
[#]=///=[#] ‘88 Panda 4x4
BSA B31
MF35
Stiga Tornado
Many Bicycles

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4314
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by mwmackenzie » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:48 pm

ClarkyBoy wrote:
mwmackenzie wrote:Panamera (Barge) 7.50 :shock:

I'm surprised that the M3 CSL with only 10bhp and over 300kg more was faster than the Exige S ?
I'd put that down to more CSL's being ragged round the ring more times than the Exige?

shed load of variables on fast laps,

a good gauge is usually sport auto (german car mag) pretty much the same drivers setting each time (usually Horst Von Saurma).

quick time none the less!
Like the old LM cars the long tail would have been quicker, that's why you goy a tourer, right? lol
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Merc family hack [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4314
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Lotus Exige S 7.53 Ring Time

Post by mwmackenzie » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:48 pm

ClarkyBoy wrote:
mwmackenzie wrote:Panamera (Barge) 7.50 :shock:

I'm surprised that the M3 CSL with only 10bhp and over 300kg more was faster than the Exige S ?
I'd put that down to more CSL's being ragged round the ring more times than the Exige?

shed load of variables on fast laps,

a good gauge is usually sport auto (german car mag) pretty much the same drivers setting each time (usually Horst Von Saurma).

quick time none the less!
Like the old LM cars the long tail would have been quicker, that's why you got a tourer, right? lol
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Merc family hack [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

Post Reply