How many wheels does it need, to be entered?Gourlay83 wrote:Corner weighted my car yesterday. If you allow me to deduct the screen and doors (camping spec) a whopping 495kg.
Do I win ?
Alan

How many wheels does it need, to be entered?Gourlay83 wrote:Corner weighted my car yesterday. If you allow me to deduct the screen and doors (camping spec) a whopping 495kg.
Do I win ?
Alan
IMO Power to weight does not always give the full story eitherStevoraith wrote:Vey good post Campbell.
The power-to-weight debate can then be had once we know 'facts'.
Obviously charge cooled but is that a standard K20 engine ?Scuffers wrote:go on Tut, you know you want it:
This is exactly the point and I can categorically state that when Simon (Scuffers) and I did my Honda conversion, absolutely nothing else was changed/upgraded/removed/added at the same time. I weighed my car before and after the conversion to get a true weight difference. The car weighed 734kg before the conversion and 749kg after the conversion. Same fuel level, everything absolutely identical apart from the conversion.Stevoraith wrote:So what you ideally need are before- and after-Honda-conversion figures on the same car I supopse.Shug wrote: There was also a rolling programme of upgrades that gradually snuck kerb weight up seemingly on a weekly basis at first - so you can't be totally exhaustive about this.
But KingK has stated that a Honda conversion weighs 50kg+ more than a standard K, which is a very large differnce, so I guess two cars of roughly the same age, one with Honda, one with K could give a good approximation of whether this could be close to the truth or not.
Whatever way you look at it, weights of a block stripped of ancillaries, or a gearbox on it's own aren't really relevant- you need to take all the components of an engine conversion as a whole.
philthy wrote:Even my other half just commented on how bad that engine bay is...
Scuffers wrote:so, that cars been a work in progress for how many years?
at least I can post up pictures of installs that don't look like bodgeit and co.
Dipper wrote:"I'll have to see if I can find someone who wants to build a blown engine to trip this one up!"
Good luck with that. Would need to be someone who doesn't read the forum!
Scuffers wrote: you still just don't get it do you?
that's a std K20A2 with cams, an off the shelf supercharger/IC kit, job done.
no 'special' stuff that's un-obtainium, no waiting about for 10 years for something that may well never appear.
it's out there, winning in open competition (and whilst Time Attack may not be the pinnacle of Motorsport, it's still open competition).
Look, cut the crap, time to put up or shut up, list the cars/owners that have engines you built, along with their results, you have had 10 years now, the book is never going to happen, time to come clean.
I have no idea who built your Ks? but who is to say they were any better than on the "Why I don't like what gets done to the K series ' thread?......roadboy wrote:
This is exactly the point and I can categorically state that when Simon (Scuffers) and I did my Honda conversion, absolutely nothing else was changed/upgraded/removed/added at the same time. I weighed my car before and after the conversion to get a true weight difference. The car weighed 734kg before the conversion and 749kg after the conversion. Same fuel level, everything absolutely identical apart from the conversion.
So, as has been stated many many times, an N/A Link-Up conversion adds 15kg to the overall weight. Something Mr. Erland happily ignores and quotes weights of bare engines over and over.
I am a huge fan of the K series and have thrown a lot of money at my current one but if I coukd race in the series I run in with a Honda lump then I would.
HTH
Dan
mikeyb13 wrote:Good point but only a fair point if you can compare how much would it cost to make a 380 bhp k-series?
Ps Scuffers, if you after an n/a car to show how cheaply 280ish can be acheived give me a shout