BA near miss

Anything goes in here.....
Post Reply
User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

BA near miss

Post by tut » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:51 pm

I love it.

The hands on pilot was the Co-Pilot, F/O Coward...............

tut

User avatar
ruadh08
Posts: 1257
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Sunny Perthshire

Post by ruadh08 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:20 pm

Sounds like he didn't live up to his name then, miraculous that it didn't end in disaster. Bet his underpants needed changing when the power cut!!

I like the comments from one of the passengers saying that he though it was just a heavy landing. He has obviously been a passenger on too many easyjet flights!

And of course how lucky that it didn't land on Gordon Browns plane at the other end of the runway....................
Paul G

The elder, occasionally more sensible member of "Team Still Game"

User avatar
james
Posts: 471
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:10 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by james » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:59 pm

ruadh08 wrote: And of course how lucky that it didn't land on Gordon Browns plane at the other end of the runway....................

so only the second best outcome for the country then :lol:

Maybe next time :)

User avatar
graeme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Kintore

Post by graeme » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:25 pm

F/O did a great job. Seems he had a level head, reacted quickly, got the nose up, glided her in. Lots of luck involved in making it to the perimeter fence though... Could so easily have been loss of life.

Hats off to F/O Coward :)

*raises a glass*
211
958

User avatar
Mr Momo
Posts: 2832
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 12:39 am
Location: ABZ

Post by Mr Momo » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:28 pm

So maybe people should now stop wingeing (sp) when it takes an extra minute to get your sandwich or there's no peanuts.......

Thats not what cabin crew are for !
Emira - Volvo spec
A1 Black Edition - Ilford HP5 spec

User avatar
graeme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Kintore

Post by graeme » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:41 pm

Mr Momo wrote:So maybe people should now stop wingeing (sp) when it takes an extra minute to get your sandwich or there's no peanuts.......

Thats not what cabin crew are for !
Very well said.
211
958

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 9314
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Preston

Post by Rich H » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:16 pm

They did very well, however both enignes failing at the same time suggests a lack of fuel... Lets hope not... :shock:
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers

tenkfeet
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: BA near miss

Post by tenkfeet » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:29 pm

tut wrote:I love it.

The hands on pilot was the Co-Pilot, F/O Coward...............

tut
Very funny .

I found the whole parade of the crew for the media quite embarrassing .

Will be interesting to hear what the full report says and the repercussions.

http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/latest_news/ ... report.cfm
Last edited by tenkfeet on Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No lotus
Exige Sport 350 (Sold)
Elise Cup 250 (Air con and radio tubby spec) (Sold)
Evora S (sold)

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Post by BiggestNizzy » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:31 pm

RICHARDHUMBLE wrote:They did very well, however both enignes failing at the same time suggests a lack of fuel... Lets hope not... :shock:
my money's on a failure of the electronics, don't these things land tjhemselves nowadays ?
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

woody
Posts: 5636
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Post by woody » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:35 pm

BiggestNizzy wrote:
RICHARDHUMBLE wrote:They did very well, however both enignes failing at the same time suggests a lack of fuel... Lets hope not... :shock:
my money's on a failure of the electronics, don't these things land tjhemselves nowadays ?
They tend to one way or another, as we've just found out :lol:

Doubt it was lack of fuel - if the systems were working the pilot should have known well before the approach. Double flame out is extremely rare, but does happen very occasionally.

fd
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:56 pm

Post by fd » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:54 pm

Image

Software is dangerous . . .

Fd

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Post by tut » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:29 pm

I actually feel sorry for the crew.

I have been there and had friends even more so, and being lauded as a hero for doing your job is bloody embarrassing, and doing the rounds and interviews afterwards is even worse. Mind you I never complained about the groupies.

We do not know the facts yet, but if power was lost completely, or was not available when the throttles were opened, there would have been no time for check lists or even thought, so assuming that they were not doing an automated landing, all the pilot can do is try to stretch the glide without stalling, in this case clear the perimeter fence, and put it down in a straight line.

All runways are designed with an undershoot, so there were a few hundred metres of wet grass/mud in this case which ripped part of the undercarriage off and did a quick stop. The cabin crew look as if they did a great job with virtually no warning and certainly deserve praise.

However when I have to listen to so called experts analysing it all afterwards and telling me that the pilots will be in trauma and may never recover from it, I start screaming at the telly.

They will be chuffed to hell that they got it right, put it down safely, and that they and their passengers are all alive and well. And then if they are allowed to they will get together with the rest of their crew and go off for a good piss up.

However I doubt very much nowadays that the latter could happen.

tut

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Post by robin » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:38 pm

Here here. They did what they were supposed to do and got everyone off alive - no way are they traumatised - it's different for the pax - they were just passengers ;-) - when something bad happens and it's completely out of your control, it can get to you - but when you do the best you can and it pans out it's the opposite I think.

Cheers,
Robin


tut wrote:I actually feel sorry for the crew.

I have been there and had friends even more so, and being lauded as a hero for doing your job is bloody embarrassing, and doing the rounds and interviews afterwards is even worse. Mind you I never complained about the groupies.

We do not know the facts yet, but if power was lost completely, or was not available when the throttles were opened, there would have been no time for check lists or even thought, so assuming that they were not doing an automated landing, all the pilot can do is try to stretch the glide without stalling, in this case clear the perimeter fence, and put it down in a straight line.

All runways are designed with an undershoot, so there were a few hundred metres of wet grass/mud in this case which ripped part of the undercarriage off and did a quick stop. The cabin crew look as if they did a great job with virtually no warning and certainly deserve praise.

However when I have to listen to so called experts analysing it all afterwards and telling me that the pilots will be in trauma and may never recover from it, I start screaming at the telly.

They will be chuffed to hell that they got it right, put it down safely, and that they and their passengers are all alive and well. And then if they are allowed to they will get together with the rest of their crew and go off for a good piss up.

However I doubt very much nowadays that the latter could happen.

tut
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Post by tut » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:44 pm

Just read the AAIB report above. Very interesting, and if verified, it looks as if neither pilot took part in the landing.

Many of you will have seen the spoof film "Airplane".

I reckon it was the inflatable autopilot George that was probably the hero.

Remember the scene where the stewardess was blowing(sic) him up as he slowly deflated?

tut

ps ah those were the days. To hell with inflight coffee.......

tenkfeet
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by tenkfeet » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:49 pm

No lotus
Exige Sport 350 (Sold)
Elise Cup 250 (Air con and radio tubby spec) (Sold)
Evora S (sold)

Post Reply