Grand Designs

Anything goes in here.....
User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Grand Designs

Post by Shug » Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:25 pm

Fair enough - we were pissed off when we turned over and found it unwatchable - must have been a signal problem near us last night. Glad we didn't miss much.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 9314
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Preston

Re: Grand Designs

Post by Rich H » Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:35 pm

Inside could be nice, the outside is gopping though :roll:
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers

woody
Posts: 5637
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Re: Grand Designs

Post by woody » Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:38 pm

Shug wrote:Fair enough - we were pissed off when we turned over and found it unwatchable - must have been a signal problem near us last night. Glad we didn't miss much.
Funny, last night was the first time in ages ch4 has worked upstairs for me.

It was the worst GD i've seen in aa long time. Not much in the way of design either.

User avatar
jamie
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Burgh

Re: Grand Designs

Post by jamie » Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:56 pm

The majority of the houses may not be to ones tastes but normally you can apriciate the owners realising their dream. This one just seemed like a nutter with a mix of bad taste specialising is fake US mills, plus bad luck and lacking the ability to make an intelligent decision. :roll:

User avatar
ed
Posts: 9677
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 12:33 pm

Re: Grand Designs

Post by ed » Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:02 pm

Agreed the design wasnt up to much, but personally i was inspired by the chap attempting to fulfill his dream. Also doing most of the work himself was a feat in it self i reckon.

The show has gone some way to give me the kick up the ar5e that i require to get on and do something with my land. I will of course build to my planning and make sure ive got everything in writing! :)
Octopus Energy Referral Code (£50 each!) share.octopus.energy/light-lynx-588

User avatar
GregR
Posts: 6933
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:45 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Grand Designs

Post by GregR » Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:38 pm

jasonliddell wrote: not as bad as the house boat disaster one a few years back though :lol:
My sentiments exactly!
Ferrari 458
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V

User avatar
kenny
Posts: 7666
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Bearsden

Re: Grand Designs

Post by kenny » Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:57 pm

Weekly bump, on in an hour.

User avatar
wee-mick
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:21 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Grand Designs

Post by wee-mick » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:07 pm

this weeks gets a poor review in the newspaper, but sounds interesting tho. :thumbsup
I don't have to sell my soul... He's already in me.

jj
Posts: 4887
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:30 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: Grand Designs

Post by jj » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:12 pm

Seem like a pair of gimps so far :lol:

User avatar
kenny
Posts: 7666
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Bearsden

Re: Grand Designs

Post by kenny » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:17 pm

Project is very similar to one I did the structural design for years ago. Architect had a victorian mansion house that was gutted in a fire. Rebuilt with a semi circular glass and steel extension.

Be interesting to see how this one turns out although they have just got rid of their main contractor and are running it themselves so it will be a fcking disaster.

User avatar
wee-mick
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:21 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Grand Designs

Post by wee-mick » Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:03 pm

Like that a lot, agree should have been left single level, and the fittings in new "wing" are a bit clinical and cold, but pers think id be happy there, stunning views, amazing to watch the change in the weather and seasons. Couldnt get the thought of mark lammar out my head from the first time i saw the guy though
I don't have to sell my soul... He's already in me.

jj
Posts: 4887
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:30 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: Grand Designs

Post by jj » Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:04 pm

Very cool end result. 8)

Didnt like them much, Agreewith kev on the two storey bit looking a bit odd....

They have spent some money - the sofas in the modern extension would have been the best part of £20k
(we are the Scottish dealer for the same manufacturer).

The rest of the interior was way too forced, they should have got a pro in, it was far too like a NextHome catalogue :?

User avatar
Rag_It
Posts: 4286
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Perth/Fife

Re: Grand Designs

Post by Rag_It » Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:07 pm

Kenny, the disaster that was planned when they dumped their main contractor never came to light, and I have to say, I thought they did a great job of turning the place around with him not giving much other than his chequebook, and she ended up running the show with the help of her contractors, as she admitted herself.

I agree with the Kevster, that they shouldn't have added the second story of the new build, but i can see why they did, but still would have look visually better with the single story new build.

Anyway, yes it wasn't filled with the disasters and set backs that make grand designs the show for what it often is, but i thought it was good!

*edited to say that JJ changed his mind having seen the end so i will let him off with his brash statement!*

woody
Posts: 5637
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Re: Grand Designs

Post by woody » Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:34 pm

jj wrote:Very cool end result. 8)

Didnt like them much, Agreewith kev on the two storey bit looking a bit odd....

They have spent some money - the sofas in the modern extension would have been the best part of £20k
(we are the Scottish dealer for the same manufacturer).

The rest of the interior was way too forced, they should have got a pro in, it was far too like a NextHome catalogue :?
The table she designed was :puke


I quite like the end result, certainly not the disaster I expected. Not sure the two parts worked together that well in the end; The curve of the new part detracted appeared too deliberate an attempt to counter the squareness of the old. As above, the two storey part was odd.

User avatar
kenny
Posts: 7666
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Bearsden

Re: Grand Designs

Post by kenny » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:13 am

Rag_It wrote:Kenny, the disaster that was planned when they dumped their main contractor never came to light
They clearly had money to burn.

jj wrote:They have spent some money - the sofas in the modern extension would have been the best part of £20k
(we are the Scottish dealer for the same manufacturer).?
A million to buy the place plus what they spent on it. They never revealed their budget or their final spend, I suspect if they had it would very much been a financial disaster for most people, they were lucky enough to have his banking bonuses to fall back on.

The folly was nice, the rest was another contemporay nonsense that looked more like a visitor centre than a home.

Post Reply