Geometry Setup

The place to "speak geek"
User avatar
Gourlay83
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by Gourlay83 » Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:44 pm

Mikie711 wrote:Ballast in the drivers seat isn't important. Suspension is a dynamic thing so all your looking for is consistant base settings. i.e. the car ride height is where you want it, not to much static droop, chamber is equal side to side, but can be different front to back. front toe and rear toe are set equal side for side and your castor is the same side for side. Seloc has a list of standard settings in their Wiki have a look.
Know what you mean Mike but the figures do change when you have weight on the seat. When setting up myt car (you were there). One side changed by 0.5 when I sat in the car.
"Chicks dig scars and I measure mine in feet"

Ford Fiesta Zetec \m/ - Get's me erse to work spec.
Caterham R500 - The grenade powered one.

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4311
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by mwmackenzie » Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:57 pm

mine is getting done on friday morning but I'll not be there to sit in it.... will that be an issue? :?

http://wiki.seloc.org/a/Geo_Setups :thumbsup
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Merc family hack [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

User avatar
Mikie711
Posts: 4344
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire.
Contact:

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by Mikie711 » Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:41 am

All the advice I value with regard to suspension geometry, dampener settings, ride heights etc comes from my experience with the S1 which, as some know, had top drawer kit fitted to it pretty much from the off. After long discussions with many people, most of whom do this sort of thing for a living it became apparent that nearly all of them never ballast the drivers seat. After talking this over with one Mr Randell he explained in terms I couldn't even begin to understand why they don't use ballast. It really doesn't make that significant a difference to the car when it's cornering as all the loads are dynamic and constantly changing depending so many factors.

That and I doubt any of us would be able to tell the difference anyway.
Elise S2 260
BMW M2 Comp
RRS HST
BMW R1300GS

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4311
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by mwmackenzie » Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:59 am

Phew....Thanks Mikie! :thumbsup
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Merc family hack [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

steviej
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Elgin

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by steviej » Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:29 pm

Hi, just out of curiosity where should the front camber be? standard setting says -0.1deg but other threads say -1.0deg, although -0.1 doesnt seem enough does anyone know if -1.0 have a big effect on turn in and/or tyre wear
Everything else i've read seems agreed on
front toe 0 to -0.5 mm (toe out)
Rear toe +1.8 - +2.0 mm (toe in)
Rear camber -1.8 - -2.0 deg
Hoping to have a home geo session with mine next week
Stevie

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by Shug » Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:31 pm

Depends on overall setup - I've run with up to -1.5 and a good chunk of toe out. -1 is a pretty good road/track compromise on an S2 I believe.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
mckeann
Posts: 5370
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:20 am
Location: Bo'ness

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by mckeann » Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:20 pm

it all depends what you use the car for. -0.1 is
fine if its a motorway hack, or driven to the shops. -2.5 is great on track with sticky tyres. -1 is a good compromise for twisty road/track on a range of tyres, but the inside edges will wear a wee bit quicker than standard. Turn in is sharper and quicker the more extreme you go, but -1 is ok. -1 is the most you can get on an S2 anyway with no shims, so start there

steviej
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Elgin

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by steviej » Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:12 pm

Thanks for that, sounds like a good place to start, as I hope to use it as B road run, occasional track day car, let you know the results
Cheers - Stevie

User avatar
r10crw
Posts: 1966
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by r10crw » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:45 pm

I agree that you would have to be very special to tell whether a car has been setup with or without driver however there is not a shadow of doubt that to be perfect, driver should be in the car. This is of course for corner weighting primarily and matters less for toe/camber adjustment.
Unless the springs are perfect in that they perform linearly regardless of compression then changing the weights on each wheel (with/without driver) will affect braking/cornering and even the neutrality of the bump steer.
Hairdresser at heart.

User avatar
alicrozier
Posts: 4388
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by alicrozier » Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:49 pm

Mikie711 wrote:All the advice I value with regard to suspension geometry, dampener settings, ride heights etc comes from my experience with the S1 which, as some know, had top drawer kit fitted to it pretty much from the off. After long discussions with many people, most of whom do this sort of thing for a living it became apparent that nearly all of them never ballast the drivers seat. After talking this over with one Mr Randell he explained in terms I couldn't even begin to understand why they don't use ballast. It really doesn't make that significant a difference to the car when it's cornering as all the loads are dynamic and constantly changing depending so many factors.

That and I doubt any of us would be able to tell the difference anyway.
Somewhat obviously it makes less of a difference the stiffer the springs are...makes more of a difference on softy road cars.
All characters appearing in this post are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Any references to laptimes, speed or driving on the public highway are purely for dramatic effect.

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by tut » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:02 pm

Reckon you could put an elephant in mine and it would not make much difference. Robin reckoned there was no compression on the rears when he pushed down.

tut

User avatar
kerryxeg
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:15 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by kerryxeg » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:43 pm

tut wrote:Reckon you could put an elephant in mine and it would not make much difference. Robin reckoned there was no compression on the rears when he pushed down.

tut
Tut, Somehow I thought you'd have tried that.


Getting the geo right transformed my car, so well worth figuring out what you think would suit your driving and taking the time to get it right. And in my case it made the car much safer to drive - once the toe out at the rear was removed along with a degree of camber.

Incidentally, how much were they for the geo check, I might get mine checked.

Kerry

User avatar
CubanGav
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:17 pm
Location: North of the wall

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by CubanGav » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:45 pm

£65 then £10 for each adjustment.
Mine felt squirmy (for lack of a more professional word) in a straight line before and it's fine now. The only thing bugging me is the tyre wear on the inside fronts but not knowing how many miles are on them I dont suppose its possible to comment.

Gav.

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by Shug » Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:02 am

CubanGav wrote:£65 then £10 for each adjustment.
Mine felt squirmy (for lack of a more professional word) in a straight line before and it's fine now. The only thing bugging me is the tyre wear on the inside fronts but not knowing how many miles are on them I dont suppose its possible to comment.

Gav.
Elises do that if not driven hard enough in the twisties or given too many motorway miles :mrgreen:
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
CubanGav
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:17 pm
Location: North of the wall

Re: Geometry Setup

Post by CubanGav » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:43 pm

Job 1: Have it fixed.
Job 2: Fix roof leak.
Job 3: Learn to drive properly.

:thumbsup

Post Reply