Ambulances blocking the road

graeme · Post by **graeme** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:49 pm

Totally appropriate ed. It was vile.

tut · Post by **tut** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:10 pm

robin wrote:Meh, you didn't have any other use for them

Is that the "meh" from General Melchett in BA Robin?

tut

tut · Post by **tut** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:16 pm

Did not see his post, but he joined today at 1601, so presume he was some form of low life.

Hopefully a new low life and not some one with a pseudonym.

tut

scottishselise · Post by **scottishselise** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:53 pm

Was the insult aimed at anyone in particular(not that it is important, just curious).

mikeyb13 · Post by **mikeyb13** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:48 pm

I did read the original post. None of it needs repeating. Good to see you removed it so quick Ed

A community shouldn't be about sides

We all can defend ourselves online or attack others in this imaginary world and if someones poking you its your choice wether to rise above it or go all mental

We aren't always going to see eye to eye but some of whats been happening recently is just not on and personally I dont want any of this childish nonsense become real.

scottishselise · Post by **scottishselise** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:22 pm

Wasn't asking for a repetition, it was clearly inappropriate but I was just asking if it was personal, if so, that's worse. As I say, not important and good work getting rid so quickly.

mikeyb13 · Post by **mikeyb13** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:29 pm

Sorry. It was very personal and named a couple of individual people who as far as Ive found in my short time here are two of the nicest fellows you could ever meet.

Pimpernel · Post by **Pimpernel** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:32 pm

The comments were about shug and the nature of some of his posts. but rather than remove the offending naughty words the whole post gets deleted. Lazy moderation.

"scottish elises - you dont have to be a mod to insult people on here, but unless you are it will be deleted anyway"

mikeyb13 · Post by **mikeyb13** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:37 pm

Rubbish. Ive insulted everyone on here. And half the place isnt talking to me as a result, but my posts arent deleted.
To be fair mines are sometimes by accident trying to be funny. IMHO You took it too far.

tut · Post by **tut** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:39 pm

Problem is that he does not sound like a newbie first post, that would not make sense.

Presume that if he is an existing member, then somebody could trace backwards to the source.

tut

scottishselise · Post by **scottishselise** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:40 pm

How would you know what Scottish Elise's tag is? You have only been here 5minutes and your first post is full of abuse/insulting text.

Are you coming to track day 10th or 17th?

Kelvin · Post by **Kelvin** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:42 pm

tut wrote:Did not see his post, but he joined today at 1601, so presume he was some form of low life.

Hopefully a new low life and not some one with a pseudonym.

tut

If my experience of moderating SELOC is anything to go by it will, in all likelihood, be someone known to SE under a double login but without the necessary balls to say what he thinks openly and honestly under his usual login name.

tut · Post by **tut** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:49 pm

That is what I thought Kelv, would be a shame, but sounds like something has crawled out of the woodwork.

tut

Kelvin · Post by **Kelvin** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:06 pm

tut wrote:That is what I thought Kelv, would be a shame, but sounds like something has crawled out of the woodwork.

tut

On SELOC we can do some basic checking and often catch people out this way. However, it's easy enough to get around so not foolproof. You also become quite adept at working out who they are by how/what they write. All a bit pathetic really.

Gareth · Post by **Gareth** » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:11 pm

Kelvin wrote:
tut wrote:Did not see his post, but he joined today at 1601, so presume he was some form of low life.

Hopefully a new low life and not some one with a pseudonym.

tut
If my experience of moderating SELOC is anything to go by it will, in all likelihood, be someone known to SE under a double login but without the necessary balls to say what he thinks openly and honestly under his usual login name.

Well it ain't me.
I've said my peace and moved on.

Scottish Elises