Why don't I like Honda K20's

The place to "speak geek"
KingK_series
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:10 am

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by KingK_series » Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:12 pm

j2 lot wrote:What does it matter. No one here gives

It matters because the Hondistas have been preaching that the difference is just 15 kg and that is just not true


it matters because the weight does make a difference to the handling - that's why Honda cars require higher rate rear damper springs


it matters because the ESSENCE of Lotus and Colin Chapman's whole philosophy is light weight above all else, and he would not like the Honda conversion.


it matters because a lot of people believe it matters and understand why


but most of all it matters to me because 15kg is a complete fabrication which has been used to help justify the Honda conversion.

KingK_series
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:10 am

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by KingK_series » Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:16 pm

tut wrote:I agree that it is more than 15kg, at least with my car. Reckon more like 30kg, ie:- the original N3 TUT would probably have been around 735kgs, and I doubt that you would get it less than that with a bog standard Jan '77 car, which mine was.

tut

A NA Honda engine install with full SS exhgaust is about 45oddkg heavier than a stok Rover engine install with ss exhaust


a NA Honda k20a2 install with exhaust is about 60kg heavier than a KingK engine + PG1 install and ss exhaust.


and this is the truth!
Last edited by KingK_series on Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4309
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by mwmackenzie » Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:22 pm

Groovy, a std elise with me in it is almost 100Kg heavier :blackeye
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Fancy Ass Merc thingy S [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by BiggestNizzy » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:40 pm

mwmackenzie wrote:Groovy, a std elise with me in it is almost 100Kg heavier :blackeye
Only 100 ?
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

KingK_series
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:10 am

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by KingK_series » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:53 pm

mwmackenzie wrote:Groovy, a std elise with me in it is almost 100Kg heavier :blackeye

Wot? you']ve been eating Honda K20s???


whooooo MICKEYB13, and Roadboy are going to be soo so upset with you!!!

KingK_series
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:10 am

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by KingK_series » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 pm

So come on Roadboy!


how do you get 15kg


ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE PG1 BOX IS 25KG HEAVIER THAN THE HONDA BOX???/

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by BiggestNizzy » Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:04 pm

As I read this a Honda K is heavier than a rover K, everyone agree's conversions seem to save some weight which offsets the corner weights a bit.

Tut has a Honda with lots of power, you have built rover K powered cars with lots of power. They both have there merits I'm sure some people will prefer opne route some the other as we are all different we will never get an agreement on what is "best"

Let us leave it at that please. I enjoy the technical threads can we leave them at this is good, this is bad this is why.

Everyone makes a big thing about Chapmans performance through lightweight thing, personally I don't think he gave a sh*t about it he cared about winning races (road cars helped pay for that hobby) and having something lighter made you go faster. He was an Engineer and thought like one.
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4309
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by mwmackenzie » Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:43 pm

BiggestNizzy wrote:
mwmackenzie wrote:Groovy, a std elise with me in it is almost 100Kg heavier :blackeye
Only 100 ?
Maybe even as little as 96?

If that little weight is such an issue just never offer pax rides etc, I'm sure the average pax must be 70odd Kg? Hmmmmm that said a decent leg must be the best part of 20KG :lol: ... really does it matter that much in the grand scheme of things, not to me it doesn't otherwise I'd try and lose a few KGs lol... both have their merits and fans so who am I to tell anyone what to like or other wise?? so, I won't! I'll let folk have their opinions and leave it at that :thumbsup

Good Day Gentlemen! :cheers
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Fancy Ass Merc thingy S [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

User avatar
s29ttc
Posts: 1712
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:03 am

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by s29ttc » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:02 am

These moans bore me, it's like a record on repeat. I absolutely love good technical discussions but the way this is going is just childish, aggressive, and trying to prompt a reaction. I dont understand why technical discussions need to come across like this. This discussion went on and on and on before and we thought it was over, let's open up another can of worms and prompt reactions with the same old sh*t. Leave this point and move onto another.

Please stop the childish reactions, it's like being in a playground. Road boy from his experience have found x and from yours is y, great finish lets move on.

If you want to continue technical discussions can we please put them across in a mature, non aggressive manner and vary the points now and again, then it may give the community something interesting to read and discuss, rather than come on argue same point for months upon end in a manner which gets people's backs up.
Image

1999 S1 Elise 111S - Fun Spec

2004 Mercedes Benz CLK 200 - Daily Driver Spec

2004 Mitsubishi Shogun- Dog Transport Spec

User avatar
Dipper
Posts: 425
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:40 pm

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by Dipper » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:02 am

putting aside all the nonsense, what i still dont get(and i think i posted this months ago) is, why the k series? its not been made for years, its dead and gone(as is the K20 now). if going to the expense of a conversion now(or contemplating a uber bling, uber expensive king k engine rebuild) why not go with something modern? ive no idea what but surely there must be light weight, pokey, reliable engines that would be better for the job? eg. theres a plethora of tiny cc turbod cars and the likes these days.

as all the s1's and early k series s2's are kicking on a bit now is there really much of a market for expensive conversions/rebuilds? I know i had a brief moment when i contemplated SC'ing my honda'd car but when you do the sums it would be more cost effective to buy a much newer car with the 260 conversion. :scratch

pete
Vexatious Litigant
Posts: 4706
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:23 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by pete » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:10 am

mwmackenzie wrote:
BiggestNizzy wrote:
mwmackenzie wrote:Groovy, a std elise with me in it is almost 100Kg heavier :blackeye
Only 100 ?
Maybe even as little as 96?

If that little weight is such an issue just never offer pax rides etc, I'm sure the average pax must be 70odd Kg? Hmmmmm that said a decent leg must be the best part of 20KG :lol: ... really does it matter that much in the grand scheme of things, not to me it doesn't otherwise I'd try and lose a few KGs lol... both have their merits and fans so who am I to tell anyone what to like or other wise?? so, I won't! I'll let folk have their opinions and leave it at that :thumbsup

Good Day Gentlemen! :cheers
<exits stage left to weigh leg>

Hang on I use my leg!! Almost every day!!!

There must be an organ we don't use... Does anyone know what a spleen does?

Appendix! And Tut, isn't yours in a jungle somewhere?

SC Honda my arse, Tut is lighter than me. That's why he is faster!
'99 - '03 Titanium S1 111S.
'03 - '10 Starlight Black S2 111S
'11 - '17 S2 135R
'17 - '19 S2 Exige S+
'23 - ?? Evora

User avatar
cstrachan
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:49 pm

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by cstrachan » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:27 am

Why not just use the lotus designed Astra engine? :damnfunny
2003 Vauxhall VX220 2.2
2013 Astra BiTurbo
2015 Fiesta Ecoboost

User avatar
Dominic
Posts: 14441
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Milton Of Campsie
Contact:

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by Dominic » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:41 am

cstrachan wrote:Why not just use the lotus designed Astra engine? :damnfunny
:shock:








:damnfunny
http://www.dsaccountancy.com

1999 Lotus Elise Sport 135'99

KingK_series
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:10 am

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by KingK_series » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:48 am

Dominic wrote:
cstrachan wrote:Why not just use the lotus designed Astra engine? :damnfunny
:shock:








:damnfunny

Why not just use a properly built K

IF it's built right, it is totally reliable, powerful, and light

User avatar
cstrachan
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:49 pm

Re: Why don't I like Honda K20's

Post by cstrachan » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:52 am

KingK_series wrote:
Dominic wrote:
cstrachan wrote:Why not just use the lotus designed Astra engine? :damnfunny
:shock:








:damnfunny

Why not just use a properly built K

IF it's built right, it is totally reliable, powerful, and light

It comes is NA or Turbo versions is totally reliable, powerful, and light no need to convert anything pick a VX220 today and we can be done with the K series Vs Honda. Astra power FTW :lol:
2003 Vauxhall VX220 2.2
2013 Astra BiTurbo
2015 Fiesta Ecoboost

Post Reply